Back together: on Germany coalition deal

A coalition(alliance/union-गठबंधन) between the Social and Christian Democrats is in Germany’s larger interests

The decision of the conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and the Social Democratic Party (SPD) to form a new coalition government is no surprise. Since the emergence of the CDU’s Angela Merkel as German Chancellor in 2005, both have cohabited(live together-साथ रहना) in a coalition for eight years. After the two parties registered their worst (defeat/beat-सबसे खराब) showing in the September 2017 general elections, they lost whatever little appetite(fervor/zeal-जोश) remained to rule together. The SPD had declared it would stay in the opposition, rebuild(renovate) the weak organisation and re-establish its core left-wing identity. The latest arrangement is a result of political pragmatism(behaviorism-व्यवहारवाद), and a willingness(alacrity/readiness-इच्छा) to accord (consent consensus-समझौते) primacy (supremacy / priority-प्रधानता) to the national interest, despite ideological differences. 

Germany had come close to calling another election after the conservatives(rightist/republican-परंपरावादियों) failed to reach an understanding with the greens and the liberals late last year. That meant a minority government was the only alternative, one that did not appeal either to Ms. Merkel or her party. Inexorably (outrage / atrocity-क्रूरता), there was a rethink. The process was helped by a common concern within the CDU and the SPD, namely, the risk of ceding(hand over/surrender-सौंपना) space to the deeply eurosceptic, anti-immigrant and extreme-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), which surprised everyone by winning almost 13% of the vote.

The wider implications(influence/impact-प्रभाव) for the European Union of the political stasis(stability/fixture-स्थिरता) in Germany had also begun to weigh on the continent’s leaders. Some voiced the wisdom (sagacity/ intelligence-बुद्धिमत्ता) of revisiting the grand coalition proposal. The alliance now being stitched up is cause for at least some cheer, if not celebration. But there is disillusionment(disappointment/frustration-निराशा) in both party camps that far too much has been conceded(allow/admit-स्वीकार करना) to the other party in the recent talks. The SPD has bagged six ministries, including finance. This has annoyed(exasperated/angry-नाराज हो) fiscal hawks among the conservatives, who are against Berlin loosening its purse strings to prop up(maintain/handle-संभालना) ‘profligate (wasteful / extravagant-अपव्ययी)’ eurozone member-states. The coalition’s agreement on greater spending on schools, pensions and infrastructure draws heavily upon SPD programmes. 

This is likely to find public favour, given Germany’s huge budget surplus and the need to boost domestic consumption. But there is a flip side to the pragmatic compromise the parties have struck to safeguard the political middle-ground. This is the risk that voices of dissent(disagreement/non consent-असहमति) could veer(curve/change direction suddenly) to the extremes. Surveys indicate that the AfD’s vote share in September had less to do with its political appeal than with dissatisfaction with the state of affairs. In any case, the coalition is not yet a done deal. The joint programme must first be approved by SPD delegates in a party referendum. The divisions within the party over SPD leader Martin Schulz’s possible induction(arrival/advent-आगमन) as Foreign Minister may forebode(warn of/alert-सचेत करना) a turbulent (stormy/unstable-अशांत) time ahead.